Flawed Managers that Flourish
In 1990, psychologists Robert Hogan, Robert Raskin, and Dan Fazzini wrote a brilliant essay called “The Dark Side of Charisma.” It argued that flawed managers fall into three types:
Narcissists typically make judgments with greater confidence than other people . . . and, because their judgments are rendered with such conviction, other people tend to believe them and the narcissists become disproportionately more influential in group situations. Finally, because of their self-confidence and strong need for recognition, narcissists tend to “self-nominate”; consequently, when a leadership gap appears in a group or organization, the narcissists rush to fill it.
Vote for the type of managers that flourish in your organisation by clicking on the relevant check box in the column to your left.
- the High Likability Floater, who rises effortlessly in an organization because he never takes any difficult decisions or makes any enemies.
- the Homme de Ressentiment, who seethes below the surface and plots against his enemies.
- the Narcissist, the most interesting of the three, whose energy and self-confidence and charm lead him inexorably up the corporate ladder.
Narcissists typically make judgments with greater confidence than other people . . . and, because their judgments are rendered with such conviction, other people tend to believe them and the narcissists become disproportionately more influential in group situations. Finally, because of their self-confidence and strong need for recognition, narcissists tend to “self-nominate”; consequently, when a leadership gap appears in a group or organization, the narcissists rush to fill it.
Vote for the type of managers that flourish in your organisation by clicking on the relevant check box in the column to your left.
Comments
Well Saurabh, I feel that I fall into each one of these categories at one time or the another. I don't know if all these traits make me charismatic (in darker or the fairer sense) or not, but most of the times, I have found that somehow they get me the job done. I resent many of such managers lurking inside me, but I do not know how to kick them out.
I find myself in the middle category.
In our organization, at least, anybody who follows his own heart won't be any kind of manager at all! Everytime he has to take up a different kind of managerial mantle, depending on the direction in which the wind blows!
As far as I am concerned, I think I belong to the second and third categories, in 60-40 ratio, but the first kind does not apply to me at all, as I know to my own detriment!
My recipe remains the same. I hate becoming someone else. But when a situation forces me to put additional pressure on my team members, they usually understand. I keep the channels of dissent open though, which helps me correct my 'deviant' behaviour in the future.
But can one be leader, without really being a saint. My heart says no, my style says yes. You decide for yourself. Cheers!